https://www.flickr.com/photos/nenyaki/2430528033 |
I critiqued Arrick Benson's, Kian Blackey's, and Dee Schwartz's thesis and outline blogs.
Here is the link to the overview: https://docs.google.com/a/email.arizona.edu/document/d/1rc4Hy6ON_OjSN5InCznhVAfHCSqgzL8mFVAyhtLbC9Q/edit?usp=sharing
I must say, your outline is looking excellent! My only glaring issue is your claim that using "unsightly" girls will enhance the argument. The problem with using "unsightly" girls is, as insensitive as this may sound, that they do not exactly fit today's stereotype of the "girly" girl--one typically imagines her as a lollipop-eating, butterfly-chasing, flower-picking, cat-fighting cute girl. By choosing normal and pretty girls, it molds more easily into our established paradigm of the "girly" girl and makes the message more relatable. However, you might just find a way to prove that "unsightly" girls can improve Always's argument more. Try to find out!
ReplyDeleteYour outline is really well done and organized. You have a lot of diverse arguments to analyze, which is really important so you do not repeat yourself. Some of your arguments could be seen as opinions, like how they only used pretty girls. Not everyone views people the same way.
ReplyDelete